<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TragicallyNull &#187; Gripe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tragicallynull.com/categories/gripe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tragicallynull.com</link>
	<description>technology news, reviews and solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:10:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Magic Online 3.0 Review</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2009/02/13/magic-online-30-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2009/02/13/magic-online-30-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic The Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh Magic Online 3.0, how I love thee, let me count the ways&#8230; 0, that&#8217;s it.
Getting started should be easy&#8230;. should be
When you want to play Magic Online, you better have a credit card ready, because it costs $10 just to run the app. By that I mean accounts cost $10 just to create, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Magic Online 3.0, how I love thee, let me count the ways&#8230; 0, that&#8217;s it.<span id="more-262"></span></p>
<h2>Getting started should be easy&#8230;. should be</h2>
<p>When you want to play Magic Online, you better have a credit card ready, because it costs $10 just to run the app. By that I mean accounts cost $10 just to create, but come with a $10 coupon for anything in their online store, neat eh? Well not if you wanted to pay with PayPal because you assumed the PayPal button on the account creation screen is anything but decoration. If you try to use PayPal you&#8217;re fucked, the account wont process no matter what you do, even if you switch back to credit card. </p>
<p>I call support and they guy makes the *click/sucking in air* noise when I tell him I tried to use PayPal, he informs me I can&#8217;t and the name I wanted was now &#8220;lost&#8221; and I would have to do everything again with a different name. Not only do they have a big &#8220;fuck you&#8221; button on there that&#8217;s a trap, they also say I&#8217;m SOL about getting my name back. Right foot, consider yourself started out on.</p>
<h2>But at least the software is good, right?</h2>
<p>Wrong. The software is clunky and resource intensive, which is surprising for a CARD GAME with no other effects than &#8220;shimmer&#8221; on foil cards. When you maximize the window you don&#8217;t get more real estate, no, all of the interface items just scale up. The way windows are managed inside of the app is acceptable at best, everything is done in &#8220;scenes&#8221; and in the sidebar, except the sidebar is too narrow because it&#8217;s just scaled and not expanded.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s a little strong, Magic Online has a tremendous burden placed on it, that burden being the rules. It has to keep track of every single possible card interaction, every single ruling and it has to add new sets every few months, and it does it pretty well. For that, things suffer. The way the cards zoom in on middle click is very awesome though.</p>
<p>An example of how they just get it wrong is when I first got my account to work the servers went down. All servers need downtime and maintenance, I know, that&#8217;s fine. But there is absolutely no indication on the app that the servers are down, instead I get a socket error. I&#8217;m a computer guy, so I know what a socket is, but the error is so obtuse that I end up uninstalling and redownloading the multi-GB app trying to get it to work. The solution to this would be to say in the error &#8220;Unable to connect to the Magic Online servers, please check your internet connection. If the problem persists, check the server status link below.&#8221; but no, socket error, fuck you fuck face.</p>
<h2>What about the team behind it?</h2>
<p><img src="http://tragicallynull.com/backend/uploads/2009/02/magicdev-211x300.jpg" alt="magicdev" title="magicdev" width="211" height="300" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;margin-bottom:5px; size-medium wp-image-263" /></p>
<p>Incompetence is a harsh word, and I&#8217;m using it. The way everything is handled is abrupt, direct and unrefined. Even Dreamhost has better PR than the Wizards Magic 3.0 team. Everything gets labeled with &#8220;We&#8217;re on it, it gets done when it gets done.&#8221; including things like a new &#8220;Collections Server&#8221; that would resolve SHOW STOPPING issues like trades not working and 1 person losing &#8220;tickets&#8221; (de-facto in-game currency) and not gaining the cards the payed for. I briefly played in the beta for 3.0 and I got to see first hand how it feels more like 3 guys working in a basement and not a team that&#8217;s working under a division of Hasboro. But I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re not to blame, I get the feeling that they&#8217;re understaffed and over worked with unreasonable deadlines. It just would have been nice for Wizards to splurge and actually have a real developer make their cash-cow of a game.</p>
<h2>Cash-cow?</h2>
<p>They print no cards, they ship nothing to nowhere, they use art of the paper cards. The online business is a nearly 100% profit venture for them, they pay for the software development and servers, that&#8217;s all. They sell boosters/tourny packs/theme decks all MSRP which is about a dollar higher than what they cost at a store and they keep all of the money. Don&#8217;t even get my started on the <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pDVYtvSiuj8U5qU6iAJpjOg">Theme Decks</a> and what a disrespectful ripoff they are.</p>
<h2>So why even bother?</h2>
<p>At the end of the day it is the best way to play Magic. The rules engine works, so even noobs can pick it up without worrying about the &#8220;phases&#8221; or the stack, it prompts you and holds your hand along the way, automating every automatible process. You can play literally any time of the day and get in a game in < 2 minutes. That can't be beat and is a good experience... if you can afford it.</p>
<h2>How much does it cost to play Magic Online?</h2>
<p>$10, if you just want to sit there staring at the screen. $50 if you want to be competitive in casual constructed, >$100 if you want to be competitive in standard constructed tournaments. Most of this, of course, you have to rebuy every year or so when a block/core set rotates out. Drafts cost $15 (3 packs at $4 + 2 tickets at $1). People will try to tell you different, but your fun in this game does depend on how much you&#8217;re willing to spend, and that, for me, is Magic&#8217;s biggest downfall.</p>
<h2>So what do you really think?</h2>
<p>If you have the cash, Magic Online 3.0 is the best game in town. Everything works well enough to keep you sane and playing whenever you want is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2009/02/13/magic-online-30-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 Beta 4: LOL Wut?</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2008/03/12/firefox-3-beta-4-lol-wut/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2008/03/12/firefox-3-beta-4-lol-wut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/2008/03/12/firefox-3-beta-4-lol-wut/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I just downloaded a copy of Firefox 3 Beta 4 SG-1 Sigma 9 Gamma, and pretty much the gist of what I&#8217;m going to say is that I really hope they polish it before it goes live, because right now this son of a bitch is rough. Most noticeably are the new navigation icons, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I just downloaded a copy of Firefox 3 Beta 4 SG-1 Sigma 9 Gamma, and pretty much the gist of what I&#8217;m going to say is that I really hope they polish it before it goes live, because right now this son of a bitch is rough.<span id="more-230"></span> Most noticeably are the new navigation icons, both in small and full icon modes, the full version looks like a direct rip of IE7 panel which I guess is part of the &#8220;Vista Specific UI&#8221; but damn, the RSS icon is just hideous with it&#8217;s unnecessary 1px shadow and beveledness and the unrefined bookmark star that looks like someone used the shape from Photoshop to make. Not only that, but they removed the sub-back arrow, now I have to right click to see as list of the pages I&#8217;ve been to, but not only <em>that</em> but in full icon mode the remaining forward sub-arrow doesn&#8217;t even give you feedback when you click it, very sloppy in my book.</p>
<p>On the upside I do like Smart Bookmarks which allow you to view your most visited websites as well as your most recently bookmarked, the star, for it&#8217;s uglyness is a very nice way to quickly bookmark sites and the new notification system, while a little hard to get used to, is much more functional than the show stopping popup. There are also a mirriad of other features and behind the scenes stuff I&#8217;m sure, but that&#8217;s what has jumped out at me thus far.</p>
<p>All in all Firefox 3 is a needed and feature rich update that takes what works and does it&#8217;s best to make it better. It would be nice to see a little more polish before it ships but I&#8217;m not complaining, it&#8217;s the best browser available and it&#8217;s free.</p>
<p><a href="http://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-3.0b4&#038;os=win&#038;lang=en-US">Download Firefox 3 Beta 4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2008/03/12/firefox-3-beta-4-lol-wut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kinset launches 3D store &#8211; people keep not caring</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/22/kinset-launches-3d-store-people-keep-not-caring/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/22/kinset-launches-3d-store-people-keep-not-caring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/22/kinset-launches-3d-store-people-keep-not-caring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move we&#8217;ve seen a thousands times and will see a thousand times again, some company thinks putting their website or their storefront in 3D will make them unique, that for some reason people desire the &#8220;Shelf&#8221; display of items over an organized list in a web page and they will continue to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a move we&#8217;ve seen a thousands times and will see a thousand times again, some company thinks putting their website or their storefront in 3D will make them unique, that for some reason people desire the &#8220;Shelf&#8221; display of items over an organized list in a web page and they will continue to be wrong.<span id="more-207"></span> The web is it&#8217;s own kind of media, you don&#8217;t need to make it look like &#8220;the real thing&#8221;, you need to design for what it&#8217;s capable of in and of itself.</p>
<p>The company claims one of the benefits of the idea is that people not familiar with ordering online will be familiar with the shelf setup, but perhaps in the real world teaching Grandma how to search with Amazon might be easier than teaching her to &#8220;walk&#8221; though a virtual store looking for what she wants, especially seeing as how there is only one Kinset and many stores like Amazon. Give a Grandma a fish and she shops for a day, teach a Grandma to use Amazon and she&#8217;ll shop until your inheritance is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/22/kinset-launches-3d-store-people-keep-not-caring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TiVo: Transfer your lifetime service &#8211; Bend over</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/11/tivo-transfer-your-lifetime-service-bend-over/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/11/tivo-transfer-your-lifetime-service-bend-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TiVo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/11/tivo-transfer-your-lifetime-service-bend-over/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TiVo is allowing you the privilege of transferring your $200 lifetime service over to a new TiVo HD (=>$300) for the low low price of&#8230; another $200. Way to stick it to your customers, TiVo. Stop providing one of the best selling points for your product and then double charge people who got in on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TiVo is allowing you the <a href="http://www3.tivo.com/tivo-promo/show.do?pg=/buytivo/hdservicetransfer.html">privilege of transferring</a> your $200 lifetime service over to a new TiVo HD (=>$300) for the low low price of&#8230; another $200. Way to stick it to your customers, TiVo.<span id="more-176"></span> Stop providing one of the best selling points for your product and then double charge people who got in on it if they want to keep it (and not be left sitting with their semi-limp SD in their hand).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/11/tivo-transfer-your-lifetime-service-bend-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony still evil, shock is had by all</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/04/sony-still-evil-shock-is-had-by-all/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/04/sony-still-evil-shock-is-had-by-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/04/sony-still-evil-shock-is-had-by-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony remains the evil black company everyone loves to hate with their newest round of important people saying stuff they shouldn&#8217;t. This time, Sony BMG&#8217;s head lawyer, Jennifer Pariser, was quoted saying that ripping a CD was &#8220;a nice way of saying &#8217;steals just one copy.&#8217;&#8221; When will Sony and the rest of the major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony remains the evil black company everyone loves to hate with their newest round of important people saying stuff they shouldn&#8217;t. This time, Sony BMG&#8217;s head lawyer, Jennifer Pariser, was quoted saying that ripping a CD was &#8220;a nice way of saying &#8217;steals just one copy.&#8217;&#8221;<span id="more-162"></span> When will Sony and the rest of the major music labels realize that trying to charge multiple times for media serves only to alienate your fans and that fair use is still a part of the American legal system. Hopefully EMI and Universal going DRM free will pave the way for more significant and positive change in the music industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/10/04/sony-still-evil-shock-is-had-by-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KERNEL_STACK_INPAGE_ERROR when adding/playing/transferring video (.mov .mp4) or photos in iTunes 7 and QuickTime 7 in Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/19/possible-solution-kernel_stack_inpage_error-when-addingplayingtransferring-video-mov-mp4-or-photos-in-itunes-7-and-quicktime-7-in-windows-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/19/possible-solution-kernel_stack_inpage_error-when-addingplayingtransferring-video-mov-mp4-or-photos-in-itunes-7-and-quicktime-7-in-windows-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/19/possible-solution-kernel_stack_inpage_error-when-addingplayingtransferring-video-mov-mp4-or-photos-in-itunes-7-and-quicktime-7-in-windows-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had this problem since the release of Vista and it seems pretty isolated so I wasn&#8217;t able to find a solution on the internet, but though a series of events and random chance I seem to have found a solution.
Symptom(s)
When you try to add, play (Video will play for about 6 seconds) or transfer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had this problem since the release of Vista and it seems pretty isolated so I wasn&#8217;t able to find a solution on the internet, but though a series of events and random chance I seem to have found a solution.<span id="more-77"></span></p>
<h2>Symptom(s)</h2>
<p>When you try to add, play (Video will play for about 6 seconds) or transfer .mov or .mp4 (mpeg-4) video files (even from the iTunes Music Store) one of three things will happen.</p>
<ul>
<li>iTunes gracefully crashes and Windows Vista continues to function</li>
<li>Windows Vista completely hangs and ceases to function forcing a hard power-down.</li>
<li>Windows Vista will crash resulting in a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) with the error KERNEL_STACK_INPAGE_ERROR.</li>
</ul>
<p>The same outcome can occur when trying to transfer a large amount of photos to an iPod using iTunes.</p>
<p>I am using an HP A1510N with the A8N-LA Nagami2 (nForce 430 (MCP51)) mother board. I also have an additional SATA and USB HardDrive, an additional 512MB RAM and a PCIe ATI Radeon x1950PRO, I believe this error may be hardware specific as this error doesn&#8217;t occur on my Dell notebook.</p>
<h2>The Solution</h2>
<p>I reformatted and reinstalled Windows Vista, without installing anything else, even Windows Updates, I installed iTunes, but the video problems (above) persisted. I then installed all of the Windows Updates (Including optional drivers except for a Realtek sound driver) and the latest driver for my graphics card, restarted my computer and iTunes could play, transfer and add video perfectly, except for a slight problem with audio sync. Reformatting may not be necessary, check to see if you have an update in Windows Update named NVIDIA nForce Serial ATA Controller and install if it&#8217;s not already, restart and test your video files.</p>
<p>The key to the solution seems to be the NVIDIA nForce Serial ATA Controller which seems to have been released yesterday. It would make sense if iTunes was trying to access a harddrive function that the driver/ couldn&#8217;t handle resulting in Windows Vista crashing because it suspected a damage Page File. Of course, I can be SURE that this was the fix. I will update this post if anything breaks later on because of a program incompatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/19/possible-solution-kernel_stack_inpage_error-when-addingplayingtransferring-video-mov-mp4-or-photos-in-itunes-7-and-quicktime-7-in-windows-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod touch Browser Limitations</title>
		<link>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/16/ipod-touch-browser-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/16/ipod-touch-browser-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/16/ipod-touch-browser-limitations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been playing with the iPod touch pretty heavily for a couple of days now and I&#8217;ve noticed that the browser has some slight and understandable limitations on the way webpages are run in parallel, the limitation being that they aren&#8217;t. Or at least not when one of the pages has a lot of images [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with the iPod touch pretty heavily for a couple of days now and I&#8217;ve noticed that the browser has some slight and understandable limitations on the way webpages are run in parallel, the limitation being that they aren&#8217;t. Or at least not when one of the pages has a lot of images on it, in that case it closes the heavy webpage out and lets you view your other page and then reloads it when you switch back.<span id="more-74"></span> The iPod touch also only allows you to have a maximum of 8 sites open at a time regardless of their &#8220;weight&#8221;. The browser is also missing flash and java, the latter I couldn&#8217;t care less about, but the former would have been really awesome for mobile games on the touch. Hopefully they&#8217;ll add support for this later on, but knowing Apple, later on will be the next generation of the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tragicallynull.com/2007/09/16/ipod-touch-browser-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
